
Martin Signer answers:
When evaluating a Sustainable Development (SDG-aligned) project, your goal is to determine whether it is impactful, financially viable, operationally credible, and ethically sound. Strong due diligence separates well-structured development projects from “impact-washing” proposals.
Below is a structured vetting framework you can use before investing.
1. Problem Definition & SDG Alignment
Start by validating whether the project is solving a real, measurable development problem.
Ask:
-
Which specific SDG(s) does this project address?
-
What is the baseline condition (before intervention)?
-
What evidence shows this is a priority problem locally?
-
Who has validated the need (government, NGOs, local communities, data sources)?
-
Is the intervention clearly mapped to a measurable outcome?
What you want to see:
-
Clear SDG mapping (not generic “we support sustainability” language)
-
Baseline data (poverty rates, emissions, access gaps, etc.)
-
A defined target population
2. Theory of Change & Impact Logic
This is the “how does this actually work?” test.
Ask:
-
What is the causal pathway from activity → output → outcome → impact?
-
What assumptions are required for success?
-
What evidence supports this model (pilot studies, past implementations)?
-
Are there comparable projects with proven results?
Red flag: vague statements like “empower communities” without measurable mechanisms.
3. Impact Measurement & KPIs
You need quantifiable outcomes.
Ask:
-
What KPIs are tracked (e.g., CO₂ reduced, households served, income increase)?
-
How are metrics collected and verified?
-
Is there third-party validation or auditing?
-
How frequently is impact reported?
-
Are there unintended negative impacts tracked?
Strong signals:
-
Use of standardized frameworks (e.g., IRIS+, SDG indicators)
-
Independent verification or audits
-
Transparent reporting dashboards
4. Local Stakeholder Engagement
Sustainable projects fail when they are externally imposed.
Ask:
-
Who are the local implementing partners?
-
How were communities involved in project design?
-
Is there government alignment or approval?
-
Do beneficiaries have decision-making input?
-
How is cultural or regional context accounted for?
Red flag: “top-down” projects designed without local participation.
5. Financial Model & Sustainability
You must understand how the project survives financially.
Ask:
-
What is the funding model (grants, revenue, blended finance)?
-
What happens after initial funding ends?
-
What are the unit economics (cost per beneficiary, cost per outcome)?
-
What is the burn rate vs revenue generation?
-
Are subsidies required long-term?
Key insight: A “sustainable development” project that depends indefinitely on donor funding is not truly sustainable.
6. Execution Capacity
Many SDG projects fail due to operational weakness, not intent.
Ask:
-
Who is the executing team and what is their track record?
-
Have they delivered similar projects before?
-
What are the governance structures?
-
How are decisions made and monitored?
-
What partnerships are in place (NGOs, governments, private sector)?
7. Risk Assessment
You should explicitly test for downside risk.
Ask:
-
What are the main operational risks (political, environmental, logistical)?
-
What happens if adoption is lower than expected?
-
What is the contingency plan for funding shortfalls?
-
Are there regulatory or land-use risks?
-
Could the project create dependency or unintended harm?
8. Transparency & Accountability
This is where credibility is confirmed.
Ask:
-
Are financials publicly available or audited?
-
Is impact reporting independent or self-reported?
-
Can investors access raw data or only summaries?
-
What governance oversight exists (board, advisory panel)?
-
Are there conflict-of-interest disclosures?
Red flag: opaque reporting with only curated success stories.
9. Exit Options & Liquidity (for investors)
If you are investing capital, understand exit mechanics.
Ask:
-
Is this grant-based, equity-based, or revenue-share?
-
What is the expected return (financial or impact)?
-
Can capital be recovered or reallocated?
-
What is the time horizon for outcomes?
-
Are there secondary funding rounds or exit pathways?
10. Scalability & Replication
Impact increases when models scale effectively.
Ask:
-
Can this model be replicated in other regions?
-
What are the constraints to scaling (cost, regulation, infrastructure)?
-
Is technology enabling or limiting scale?
-
Has the project already scaled successfully anywhere?
Quick Due Diligence Scorecard
Rate each category 1–5:
| Category | Score |
|---|
| SDG clarity & problem definition | |
| Theory of change strength | |
| Measurable impact KPIs | |
| Local stakeholder involvement | |
| Financial sustainability | |
| Execution capability | |
| Risk management | |
| Transparency & governance | |
| Scalability | |
Key Insight
A credible SDG project should answer this cleanly:
“If we invest X, we can reliably produce Y measurable improvement for Z population over time, with transparent verification.”
If any part of that chain is unclear—impact, measurement, execution, or sustainability—you should treat it as high risk.